Donjuan

Anyone else rewatch some of the key defensive plays made by Clemson from yesterday and wonder if Venables knew our playcalls? And before anyone blasts me for mentioning this when it was obvious our lines got destroyed, Brent is known for stealing signals. SO much so, that we and other teams have to resort to QB wristbands. Most lines look bad when the other team knows what's coming. Some of our drives had plays where the D-linemen drove in the direction the play was going before the play had time to even go that direction. And some of these same drive-killing stops had these D-linemen in positions that were not going towards the QB or RB play but rather where these offensive players would end up. I guess it really doesn't matter. I do wish that ND would utilize the same gamesmanship used against it, though. Fire up the deer antler spray! Get your binoculars out and steal some signs. Whatever helps ND win that's within reason. And yes, recruit more depth on our lines! Thanks for reading my far-out conspiracy theory. I would post this to Twitter but it would probably be flagged as disinformation.

The Hunter Biden story was squashed by mainstream media/Twitter/Facebook before the election and declared to be "disinformation" (Leslie Stahl and 60 Minutes comes to mind)...and now, it's kind of being reported on. You want us to trust the same media? This is why there is lack of trust with media and social media conglomerates. Also, no big deal. I get it. There are two very distinct sides with this POTUS and I try to hear both sides, believe it or not. I appreciate our back and forth.

How can you argue against what this video shows? What can you show us to disprove this? I see you're good at attacking where, who, and how everything comes to light but you've never really addressed anything of substance. The lede, TexasDomer, is not the method in which we received this video, rather, the video itself. Let's hear an original argument against what we see in the actual video. And then, carry this same mindset over to the forensic audit of Antrim county. We'll be waiting...

Yep, nothing to see here. Just an isolated incident, I’m sure...

Lol that's hilarious. Just let us know if her face goes numb.

What I find most alarming is the extremely high rate of adjudicated ballots with zero audit trail. That seems strange to me. I think we all want the votes to be accounted for. This doesn’t lend well to that simple mindset.

Ain’t this the truth. The people shouting ‘disinformation’ are actually the ones perpetuating it. Right out of the Bible...strange how this works.

Anybody else want to discuss the actual forensic audit performed by a Harvard/Duke grad with experience working with NASA and MIT among several other highly regarded institutions?

I was at that game as well. My very first ND game, sitting in the south end zone in my grandfather's row of seats he had held onto since the late 40s. I still vividly recall the emotional letdown after that FG sailed through the uprights. I was also at the 2005 USC game under the lights. Ugh. I went to many games in between and afterward but these two games stick out to me as being the worse thing to live though as an ND fan. Complete emotional deflation walking out of the stadium.

Okay. Anyone else want to debate the actual audit itself and not the credentials of the group who performed it? In case you're wondering though, here's some of his background: 1. My name is Russell James Ramsland, Jr., and I am a resident of Dallas County, Texas. I hold an MBA from Harvard University, and a political science degree from Duke University. I have worked with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), among other organizations, and have run businesses all over the world, many of which are highly technical in nature. I have served on technical government panels. 2. I am part of the management team of Allied Security Operations Group, LLC, (ASOG). ASOG is a group of globally engaged professionals who come from various disciplines to include Department of Defense, Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security, and the Central Intelligence Agency. It provides a range of security services, but has a particular emphasis on cybersecurity, open source investigation and penetration testing of networks. We employ a wide variety of cyber and cyber forensic analysts. We have patents pending in a variety of applications from novel network security applications to SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) protection and safe browsing solutions for the dark and deep web. For this report, I have relied on these experts and resources.

It's all in the report. If you want answers, you can find them there. Let us know when you're done. We can discuss then.

It's all in the above attached document. I'm not the subject of debate, nor is my opinion on trial. Look at the evidence and debate that. 68% error rate is alarming because it kicks those "errored" ballots into a category in which a outside user can adjudicate intent. Well, lets go look at all of those adjudicated ballots then. Guess, what? They've all been deleted. Why would that be? I have no logical answer as to why that would be other than for nefarious reasons. Go after the evidence and read the actual audit. I'm interested in seeing your 'non anecdotal' response to actual hard data obtained by this forensic audit. But you have to actually read it first.

The thousands of deleted adjudicated ballots, for one. Weird that these ballots were only deleted from this current election and not prior ones. Why would that be? And why would somebody [unsuccessfully] try to delete the current voter roll? Or, the online access to these machines to make updates. That is against national election protocol. But to answer your question, I think the 68% error rate is very alarming and is probably the most damning part of this forensic audit--and can be easily replicated. Not sure you'll get the specific architectural outline you want as a lot of that was redacted for copyright/trademarked purposes laid out in Dominion's contract. Arizona has just subpoenaed for a full audit of Dominion machines based off Antrim's findings.

Okay. Let us know what you think after reading through all of the evidence and receipts.

Debate this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/zberuyi1klkpah3/Antrim_michigan_forensics_report_121320_redacted.pdf?dl=0

Campbell only wants the OSU or ND job. He said so the other day. He's waiting for either...

Agree to disagree.

These aren't evidentiary hearings. These are essentially petitions to go ahead into discovery and evidentiary proceedings within the judiciary. This is why the SCOTUS exists and I can see them wanting to explore further, especially in PA, AZ and GA. Not really sure about Nevada.

All the witnesses (former colonel, MIT Prof, 20 year poll worker, independent data analyst contracted by NSA, life-long democrat poll watcher with picture evidence...etc.) are not credible? I try to stay in the middle on political things but I think we need to hear them out and not just simply denounce them as "not credible." If they're not credible, then I don't know the definition of credible is. And here's the false 40 lawsuit argument again. Have 40 suits been dismissed? Probably. But only 3 were from the POTUS's defense council. Most were dismissed because of time allotments. Numerous were simply dismissed because they needed to go to the circuit courts first. This is the first 'election during a pandemic alleged voter fraud' instance in our history so there's bound to be numerous errors made in paperwork and judicial processes. And I think it's also important to note that a lot of these judges are left-leaning so lets not leave that out. All in all, I think we all want fair elections. We can agree on that. And I think a great way to reinforce Biden as the next POTUS-to-be is requiring signature checks on these late-counting states. If any sigs do not match voter registration info, toss them. Both Democrat and Republican. Me and my student loans will gladly accept those results. But to be able to build the foundation of an impeachment case against the POTUS with a simple hearsay witness should mean that we give the same respect to these eye witnesses and their alleged evidence who have impeccable authority in their areas of study. You can't have it two ways. I mean, a retired colonel with expertise in cyber security and we're suggesting he's not credible? This doesn't pass the smell test. Everyone should want illegal ballots to be tossed and everyone should wonder why a supposedly secure voting machine that isn't connected to the internet could have a "user-caused glitch" that swung votes one way and then back. How is that possible? Users should have no accidental ability to change votes. And how do you update a voter machine without implanting something into it or connecting online?

There’s more eye witness testimony and sworn affidavits in this ‘conspiracy’ than there was to impeach the President. Odd thing is, eye witness testimony is no longer considered reliable. Bad timing I guess. We also have another video of ballot batches being run through the machine multiple times. Interested to hear the explanation for this. Not even going to get into the massive car explosion that killed Kemp’s future son-in-law—a young staffer for Senator Loeffler—last night. Crazy video of the fire is online.

We should clarify the whole 40-1 argument just so we're all on the same legal understanding. That number is reflective of several factors. Some cases (I think around 17-20 of them) were "thrown out" because the plaintiff and defendant worked out a compromise beforehand--so the judge "dismissed" those cases in order to bring a ruling/closure to the challenge. (recounts, voter logs, sig checks...etc.) Other challenges were dismissed right away for improper paperwork. Most were cases with local attorneys representing witnesses in various forms and were confused on state/federal electoral challenges. This is to be expected as most elected officials don't even know constitutional law. Most of these witnesses have now come together and are being represented by attorneys for the POTUS. And some of these were simply thrown out by judges who didn't see enough evidence in the affidavit. Some may say they were biased based on their political leanings but it really doesn't matter. In the end, POTUS wants these cases to go to the SCOTUS and the only way that happens is by judges dismissing cases. So this is actually a good thing for POTUS and his people. A Justice just mentioned the other day after the Wiscy challenge was thrown out that the 'media/people' that portray the court dismissals as indicative of "lack of evidence/no voter fraud" are wrong as these cases are actually "far from it" and just need to go through lower courts first. Georgia just ordered signature checks on all ballots after that video came out. I have no idea what's going to happen but I'm interested to see this process play out. Visions of three old guys holding up a ballot looking at a hanging chad come to mind.

My vote was stolen so I’m a little aggravated to be honest. Nothing like waiting in line all day to find this out. Back to the video, can anyone actually explain it?

These affidavits are backed with on-stand testimony which are very court admissible. Not just papers.

Why are you so angry? Watch the video then come back and explain it. Why are ballots in suitcases and why did they send the media home as well as the observers and then start counting them? There’s video of that, too. You do understand that they know who these workers are, right? No observers and no media isn’t a good look. Ballots in unmarked suitcases hidden underneath cloth-covered tables and not in view of observers or media and faulty pipes is not the lede here. Also, observers aren’t permitted to go around snooping under tables. Remember COVID? Six foot distance was enforced in all of these centers. A hand recount simply recounted the ballots that were already “counted.” What exactly is your point? That’s like me recounting the cash in my wallet—including the $5 I took from my daughter’s piggy bank—and telling her it matched my first count from earlier so it’s mine. Lol.

And let’s roll the tape. This is getting absurd. Either A.) hundreds of deranged people are risking perjury charges with false sworn affidavits detailing diverse fraud in numerous states, B.) they’re telling the truth as they saw it, C.) all of the above. But now there’s surveillance footage of Georgia poll workers pulling out suitcases of what appears to be ballots from under a cloth-covered table and then counting them—after sending all media and observers home due to a “broken water main. I can’t keep up. I’m about to suggest we just Rock, Paper, Scissor this thing before the next alleged bombshell... As an aside, date/timestamped video evidence is hard to dispute in most cases. Would be interested in hearing an explanation.