Jump to content

ACC Against College Football Playoff Expansion


Recommended Posts

I am a little surprised by this. I thought it was guaranteed to have changed. I have been thinking, is Swarbrick fighting conference champions automatic bids? I think this year is a prime example. Utah and Pitt would have jumped numerous teams... I still think 12 teams is too many.

Alabama (SEC)
Georgia (at large)
Michigan (B1G)
Cincy (at large)
Baylor (B12)
Utah (Pac12)
Pitt (ACC)
Notre Dame (at large)

  • Heart 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO I think the ACC and possibly others are concerned with the college football landscape changing too quickly …..with NIL, transfer portal , coaches salaries . College  is were students go to learn to further their education. Colleges should not become a semi pro league for football. Again just my thoughts why the ACC is trying to put the brakes on this.

  • Heart 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ND_JACK said:

IMHO I think the ACC and possibly others are concerned with the college football landscape changing too quickly …..with NIL, transfer portal , coaches salaries . College  is were students go to learn to further their education. Colleges should not become a semi pro league for football. Again just my thoughts why the ACC is trying to put the brakes on this.

It's too late for that... the current landscape pretty much says "who cares about education, give the athletes (no longer considered student-athletes) a piece of the pie.

Edited by NDhoosier
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ACC is against it in part because of ND.  They know the smaller playoff increases the odds ND would see the point in joining a conference.  A larger playoff could in theory give ND less of an incentive depending on how it is structured.

  • Heart 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct. In order to get an overturned 4 team system, you need to have unanimous votes as to the new structure..

After the playoff deal runs it's course, it will be a majority vote: You're either with us or not with us type of deal.. 

I don't see it changing before 2025

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...