The Liar, Lunatic, Lord argument by CS Lewis is actually pretty weak and is based on several false premises that are pretty glaring when you look at them. Here is a link if ou are interested in looking at those false premises.
http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Liar,_Lunatic_or_Lord
Basically what I'm saying is you are going to be very wrong in trying to prove Christianity by logic and reason and evidence. Not bashing, just debating. I dont believe it, but because Christianity can't be proven by evidence and logic doesn't inherently make it not true. Hell it might be, but I see no reason to think it is over any other religion that exists or has existed in the past. It doesn't do any better at convincing me. Believing in Christianity requires faith, believing in something that with no proof or evidence. Just does and its the pillar of Christianity. Sounds pretty foolish to me because all other religions essentially require the same thing so how can you ever know you're right... but it should probably be something its followers should embrace.
