Check this out it's pretty cool, it's a little out dated though.

 

 

http://controls.ame.nd.edu/football/

That's pretty friggin' cool. Maybe out-dated, but then again, who would really want it to be based on Davie's or Willingham's play-calling anyway? For Davie, it would simply spit back "Play for Overtime" no matter what the scenario. For Willlingham, it would say "Do the opposite of what has been working, or run Ryan Grant up the middle."

Haha. My Willingham predictor would say, "Who cares Ty's gunna screw it up in the 4th quarter anyways."

Or maybe, "Results unclear, take a bathroom break and try again."

Lol, or "Just get to the opponents 30 yard line and punt. For best results, do this in the fourth quarter."

"No matter the outcome, keep a straight face, dodge questions from the media, and always always always blame poor execution."

Hey COOL. Nice work and high praise.

 

There are only so many permutations of a play but Coach Weis mixes them up perfectly. Coach Weis tends NOT to run the same thing you may have seen in a previous game.

 

It is frightening to see how predictable we have been in the past. If you, I and a computer can predict then you see the results of a 6-6 season.

 

CBS 60 Minutes ran a great article on how Bilichik and crew (Coach Weis) use computers to predict tendencies in others and eliminate theirs.

 

Sir John

Hey Ryan!

 

That's pretty funny, my wife and I were at the BC game last season when he drove to the 30 yard line and punted. That game was the most frustrating thing I've ever sat through. Not only was if freezing cold and raining, but Ty couldn't coach his way to a loss fast enough. Horrible first game experience for my wife. We were able to experience Ty's inability to coach first hand. CW couldn't get to South Bend fast enough as far as I was concerned.