Brian Kelly is one of the best in college football at building a program.
He had never had the chance to sustain a program at the D1 level.
He built ND back to prominence. I think the question needs to be asked if he can sustain it. It seems a bit odd that you can do one, but not the other, but some coaches are just that way.
Now there are a lot of outside forces, suspensions, injuries etc that come into play. But I think the question needs to be asked. Besides having better athletes in spots, does this program look any further along in year 5 vs year 3?
Still turn it over way to much. Still no consistent run game. Still playing to level of the opponent.
I guess my biggest concern is that Kelly is a good coach, but not great. Good coaches are hard to fire because they win 8-9 games a year, but the team stays in limbo and never takes that next step. Think Mark Richt, Frank Beamer, Kirk Ferentz etc. nothing wrong with that type of coach, you just have to set your expectations accordingly.
I've posted on this in the past.
Brian Kelly is one of the best in college football at building a program.
He had never had the chance to sustain a program at the D1 level.
He built ND back to prominence. I think the question needs to be asked if he can sustain it. It seems a bit odd that you can do one, but not the other, but some coaches are just that way.
Now there are a lot of outside forces, suspensions, injuries etc that come into play. But I think the question needs to be asked. Besides having better athletes in spots, does this program look any further along in year 5 vs year 3?
Still turn it over way to much. Still no consistent run game. Still playing to level of the opponent.
I guess my biggest concern is that Kelly is a good coach, but not great. Good coaches are hard to fire because they win 8-9 games a year, but the team stays in limbo and never takes that next step. Think Mark Richt, Frank Beamer, Kirk Ferentz etc. nothing wrong with that type of coach, you just have to set your expectations accordingly.