Jump to content

Michigan Favored By 3


nd1989

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think I am going to go out on a limb with ND winning by 10+. This will be our signature win this year much like MSU was last year. I think that our boys like playing in other people's homes and spanking them. Look at MSU, OU & USC last year. I think this is a much better offense than last year. If our defense shows what they are capable of, this could be a great ending to a modern rivalry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me crazy but I like Rees in this type of situation. Seems our QBs have a history of mental collapses at the big house but Rees seems to not be affected as much.

 

Don't forget that great TD drive at the end of the 2011 game. Its easily forgotten because of what transpired overall in the game, but when it came down to it, he put together a great drive to get us the lead.

 

We have the defense now (no matter how they played in game one) to prevent a comeback like that again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to CFB daily--Gardner looked very good---like very very good--that's a big reason for the margin combined with the fact that we lost three straight up there---

 

aloha's

 

As a runner he looked very good against an unathletic CMU team.

 

As a passer I strongly disagree. But hey CFB daily has to build up the game correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to CFB daily--Gardner looked very good---like very very good--that's a big reason for the margin combined with the fact that we lost three straight up there---

aloha's

 

10-15 for 162 1TD 2 INT 2 rush TDs vs Central Michigan? I can't call that really, really good.

 

If he recreates those throwing numbers vs ND, ND will win by three scores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10-15 for 162 1TD 2 INT 2 rush TDs vs Central Michigan? I can't call that really, really good.

 

If he recreates those throwing numbers vs ND, ND will win by three scores.

 

Looks like numbers from a QB who was able to carve a D on his feet with relative ease. Considering our LB corps was the most underwhelming unit Saturday, this concerns me. I didn't watch scUMs game, but I keep hearing how awful they were. Who exactly scored their 50+ points?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like numbers from a QB who was able to carve a D on his feet with relative ease. Considering our LB corps was the most underwhelming unit Saturday, this concerns me. I didn't watch scUMs game,but I keep hearing how awful they were. Who exactly scored their 50+points?

 

Just saying INts have been his bugaboo. If he's going to turn it over 2 or 3 times, that bodes well for ND.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I did not see the game nor the stat line and I admit that he may have looked good but TWO INTs is POOR----I guess the mix of running & passing always impresses.

 

And to be fair I think Tommy had the #6 QB rating---:grin:--of all the QBs that played this week----so they can take that--;)

 

aloha's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...