Jump to content

Why didn't ND accept Dawkins commitment?


gmac89

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nothing to do with USC. I think Ricochet said it well:

 

Dawkins is a prospect with great tools but he doesn't know how to use them or even take full advantage of those raw abilities to be a great at the HS level, where many have and then fallen flat on there faces once they reach college.

 

Dawkins can't be the main QB get out of this class and maybe not even the second one either. He's without a doubt a project prospect and would've been a nice pickup for a team that is truly set at QB for a while because while he's got elite pro level tools he has no idea how to properly use them.

 

So the best situation for him is to find a place that will have no pressure of him playing and slowly turn this tools into abilities.

 

Due to the QB depth chart now, ND needs a true QB, more refined and now. That is not Dawkins

Edited by Big23Head
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recruiting high caliber QB's every year is a disaster for us; they simply will not wait their turn. 5 star, 3 star, 5 star, 3 star is my advice.

 

That's not a bad idea at all. Get a project like Hendrix in the off years, and Golsons/Gunners in even years. More attractive depth chart, and there's always the chance that someone comes into their own by Jr year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big, i think we need 2 qbs in this cycle so why not take Kizer and Dawkins? Are we taking 1 or 2?

 

If they feel Hendrix returns then possibly 1. This is a weaker class for QBs and ND has very good standing with 3-4 QBs in 2015. Regardless I think once the staff gets a solid QB commit in this current class they will look for another late bloomer in this class if there is one. Basically it will be fluid for a while with regard to QB in the 2014 class

Edited by Big23Head
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who does ND have after this season?

 

Rees - gone

Hendrix - 5th year possible, but likely off to med school.

Zaire - returns

Golson - TBD

 

So, ND has 1 returning scholarship QB next year and 1 TBD....

 

And (according to reports) the coaches didn't accept Dawkins' commitment....wow.

 

I sure hope the staff knows something we don't or ND is one hit away from a walk-on taking snaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big, i think we need 2 qbs in this cycle so why not take Kizer and Dawkins? Are we taking 1 or 2?
Because Dawkins hasn't even done it at the HS level. He's been a INT machine.

 

Everyone has bad games but his game against Crenshaw was inexcusable. He had a QB rating of 8, yes an 8. When he's had make pass he hasn't been able to and in that game he went for 0 TD's to 5 INT's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who does ND have after this season?

 

Rees - gone

Hendrix - 5th year possible, but likely off to med school.

Zaire - returns

Golson - TBD

 

So, ND has 1 returning scholarship QB next year and 1 TBD....

 

And (according to reports) the coaches didn't accept Dawkins' commitment....wow.

 

I sure hope the staff knows something we don't or ND is one hit away from a walk-on taking snaps.

 

Add Kizer to next year's roster (assuming he signs)

 

2 scholarship QBs and 1 TBD...if Golson returns ND should be fine, if not - need another QB in this class with Kizer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...