Posted July 26, 200618 yr the duo of Armando Allen and Robert Hughes or have a feature back ala Caleb King... who would you choose? BTW... Notre Dame is a major player in the recruitment of EG...
July 26, 200618 yr That is a tough choice but I think I'd have to say Allen (5'9" 180 4.34) and Hughes (5'11" 228 4.6) over King (5'11" 196 4.46). First, having both Allen and Hughes adds depth at the RB position, and they both offer different types of running styles that would greatly help any team. Also, it seems that getting Hughes may also help us with Tez...and if there is any truth to that then I would prefer the Hughes/Allen combo. even more so. Ntm, it seems that pulling King out of the SEC may be harder than getting the other two.
July 26, 200618 yr the duo of Armando Allen and Robert Hughes or have a feature back ala Caleb King... who would you choose? The one(s) that Saracino admits.
July 26, 200618 yr this is hard because if you get to many RBs theirs the possiblity of someone transfering. but i'd go with allen and hughes and let the players decided who gets to play by what they do on the field.
July 26, 200618 yr Considering we have Aldridge from last year, I take King... We can still give it to Schwapp or Schmidt in short yardage instead of Hughes... Allen is very nice, but King can take it on any play for six... King shows on just about every play that he run with it between the tackles and then bust it outside or on a toss... Allen shows that he can take it the distance, but mainly on tosses and sweeps... King can do what both of these backs do
July 26, 200618 yr As much as I like Hughes and Allen, I would go with King. Though I would not shed a tear if we get "stuck" with Hughes and / or Allen.
July 26, 200618 yr just give me allen he is way better than caleb king imo. i watched king video at a camp, that kid could not catch a cold. allen is an everydown back with very good hands.
July 26, 200618 yr Allen and Chris Rainey are virtually the same freaking player, I don't know why Allen would still be considering them. Hopefully this kid will be Irish.
July 26, 200618 yr just give me allen he is way better than caleb king imo. i watched king video at a camp, that kid could not catch a cold. allen is an everydown back with very good hands. There is a reason King is rated 4th overall in the nation. Allen is great, but Caleb King is phenomenal. Whoever said that Hughes is huge because he holds the key to Martez Wilson, they're right. Defensive line is a far bigger need than RB. We already have Aldridge and Prince, who complement eachother quite well.
July 26, 200618 yr my biggest problem with the rankings proves out right here allen is smaller and thats why he is ranked lower, size matters to much for the services, i know it should matter some, but man ill take allen any day of the week, he is a superstar waiting to happen, king will be a good back but im telling you guys allen is going to be unreal, vagas you should be with me on this allen is so fast its not even funny
July 27, 200618 yr I say King because running backs are a lot like clothes. Do you want 3 average shirts that you like or do you want one quality shirt that you love? It's all about love baby!
July 27, 200618 yr No, I'm basically saying that I think Caleb King is a touchdown waiting to happen everytime he'd touch the ball. I like him featuring
July 27, 200618 yr I say King because running backs are a lot like clothes. Do you want 3 average shirts that you like or do you want one quality shirt that you love? It's all about love baby! Chiro, have I ever told you that you really have a way with words?
the duo of Armando Allen and Robert Hughes or have a feature back ala Caleb King... who would you choose?
BTW... Notre Dame is a major player in the recruitment of EG...