I have no idea, to be honest. I could make a really great argument that it was a TD — just like I could make one that it was a stop.

 

So what was it guys? With 100% honesty, did they get the call right?

Edited October 14, 201212 yr by ColinKSU

Who gives a f*ck.

 

It's in the record books now . . .

Who gives a f*ck.

 

It's in the record books now . . .

 

I care because it was a really tough call. We all bitched (and still do) about the Bush Push. It's only right to talk about it when one (might have) gone our way.

 

You'll be hearing quite a bit about this play during the week and the next time we see Stanford — it's definitely worth discussing.

I might not know the exact rules. the ball just needs to cross the goal line right, whether the ball comes loose or not? because it did look on the last replay that the ball crossed the line before coming loose.

not that it matters, it was called a stop.

I might not know the exact rules. the ball just needs to cross the goal line right, whether the ball comes oor not? because it did look on the last replay that the ball crossed the line before coming loose.

not that it matters, it was called a stop.

 

It certainly was called a stop. I'm not arguing for it to be reversed.

 

I'm just asking what *Domer Domain* honestly thinks it was.

a lot of talk on the twitter machine about how that should have been a TD for Stanford.

I don't bitch about the Bush Push. Refs do not call that. And they do not call it in a consistent manner.

 

That call: was his progress stopped, did the whistle blow, did he fumble before he put it over the goal line? You don't overturn that one IMHO. Given the "spirit" of the play, ND wins it. Esp at home.

even if the whistle wasn't blown dead, i thought his left elbow was down before he stretched the ball over

if we are being honest, then yes i do believe it was clearly a td...you could see the ball crossed the line...only question is when did the whistle blow???

I have no idea, to be honest. I could make a really great argument that it was a TD — just like I could make one that it was a stop.

 

So what was it guys? In 100% honesty, did they get the call right?

 

Ruling on the field was it was down. Hard to overturn that.

 

Its going to be like the Zupruder film. Down, and to the left.....down, and to the left.

I'm reading some Stanford boards and they're all complaining about the pro-ND refs, which honestly is hilarious.

 

The refs were Pac-12 on the field who ruled it a stop and Big East in the review booth. I'm not sure either conference has a lot of love lost for Notre Dame football.

This call epitomizes how the season has and hopefully will continue to go we are getting the breaks this year this is our time! I think on replay it was a touchdown however they stopped that play before his second effort so it shouldn't have been reviewed

If the ref blew his whistle then it was a stop.. but if not its definitely a TD imo.. even if he fumbled as the ball was crossing the line, a stanford player recovered it in the endzone... either way its a tough call and i'm just happy this one went our way..

if we are being honest, then yes i do believe it was clearly a td...you could see the ball crossed the line...only question is when did the whistle blow???

 

That's what no one brought up on TV, I think. When did they blow the play dead (if you could even hear it)?

I find it amusing that people say that gets called no TD because it's against Notre Dame, as if ND gets special treatment. excuse me?! ND has had plenty of calls go against them in recent years IMO because they are ND.

Blame the PAC-12 refs and the BIG EAST refs. It's not like we use our own refs.