Jump to content

Navy's Johnson to Georgia Tech


ND81

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Be interesting to see what he could at a major football school.

it's officall, navy will never beat ND again. your right it should be interesting to see how johnsons option offense will work in the ACC, should be a lot of fun to wath. with him being former georgia southern head coach he probbly has a lot of ties in the state of georgia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it sure will be fun to watch. I think Nesbitt will be a great QB for that system too. It should also free up any of the top WR's in GA for the next few years. Nebraska should have made a play for him just to get back to their roots but after seeing that team play defense they needed a defensive coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be interesting to see what he could at a major football school.

it's officall, navy will never beat ND again. your right it should be interesting to see how johnsons option offense will work in the ACC, should be a lot of fun to wath. with him being former georgia southern head coach he probbly has a lot of ties in the state of georgia.

 

Navy did not beat ND this year because of Paul Johnson. I think he's good, but it wasn't coaching genius that beat us. It was the lack of heart on our Oline, youth, no identity what so ever, coupled with absolutely atrocious work by Charlie Weis that lost that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be interesting to see what he could at a major football school.

it's officall, navy will never beat ND again. your right it should be interesting to see how johnsons option offense will work in the ACC, should be a lot of fun to wath. with him being former georgia southern head coach he probbly has a lot of ties in the state of georgia.

 

Navy did not beat ND this year because of Paul Johnson. I think he's good, but it wasn't coaching genius that beat us. It was the lack of heart on our Oline, youth, no identity what so ever, coupled with absolutely atrocious work by Charlie Weis that lost that game.

How many points did we put up? 44? Thats on the D. We only had one stop that didnt come from a turnover or missed field goal. If you want to start the Charlie hater shit take it to the SC forums. Yeah I sure wish we were Michigan right now with out a coach and had to scavange for 2 star recruits like in 2004, I sure miss those days..........NOT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be interesting to see what he could at a major football school.

it's officall, navy will never beat ND again. your right it should be interesting to see how johnsons option offense will work in the ACC, should be a lot of fun to wath. with him being former georgia southern head coach he probbly has a lot of ties in the state of georgia.

 

Navy did not beat ND this year because of Paul Johnson. I think he's good, but it wasn't coaching genius that beat us. It was the lack of heart on our Oline, youth, no identity what so ever, coupled with absolutely atrocious work by Charlie Weis that lost that game.

How many points did we put up? 44? Thats on the D. We only had one stop that didnt come from a turnover or missed field goal. If you want to start the Charlie hater shit take it to the SC forums. Yeah I sure wish we were Michigan right now with out a coach and had to scavange for 2 star recruits like in 2004, I sure miss those days..........NOT!

 

Not a Charlie hater in the least bit. I just don't wear blinders either....and Charlie was PATHETIC in the Navy game in my humble IRISH opinion. You blind faith folks are awefully touchy. Yikes...I criticized the coach, I must be a hater. I'm going back to the SC boards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be interesting to see what he could at a major football school.

it's officall, navy will never beat ND again. your right it should be interesting to see how johnsons option offense will work in the ACC, should be a lot of fun to wath. with him being former georgia southern head coach he probbly has a lot of ties in the state of georgia.

 

Navy did not beat ND this year because of Paul Johnson. I think he's good, but it wasn't coaching genius that beat us. It was the lack of heart on our Oline, youth, no identity what so ever, coupled with absolutely atrocious work by Charlie Weis that lost that game.

How many points did we put up? 44? Thats on the D. We only had one stop that didnt come from a turnover or missed field goal. If you want to start the Charlie hater shit take it to the SC forums. Yeah I sure wish we were Michigan right now with out a coach and had to scavange for 2 star recruits like in 2004, I sure miss those days..........NOT!

 

Not a Charlie hater in the least bit. I just don't wear blinders either....and Charlie was PATHETIC in the Navy game in my humble IRISH opinion. You blind faith folks are awefully touchy. Yikes...I criticized the coach, I must be a hater. I'm going back to the SC boards.

Remember guys, this guy has revoked bluester's title of the Board Pessimist! :lol:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be interesting to see what he could at a major football school.

it's officall, navy will never beat ND again. your right it should be interesting to see how johnsons option offense will work in the ACC, should be a lot of fun to wath. with him being former georgia southern head coach he probbly has a lot of ties in the state of georgia.

 

Navy did not beat ND this year because of Paul Johnson. I think he's good, but it wasn't coaching genius that beat us. It was the lack of heart on our Oline, youth, no identity what so ever, coupled with absolutely atrocious work by Charlie Weis that lost that game.

How many points did we put up? 44? Thats on the D. We only had one stop that didnt come from a turnover or missed field goal. If you want to start the Charlie hater shit take it to the SC forums. Yeah I sure wish we were Michigan right now with out a coach and had to scavange for 2 star recruits like in 2004, I sure miss those days..........NOT!

 

Not a Charlie hater in the least bit. I just don't wear blinders either....and Charlie was PATHETIC in the Navy game in my humble IRISH opinion. You blind faith folks are awefully touchy. Yikes...I criticized the coach, I must be a hater. I'm going back to the SC boards.

Remember guys, this guy has revoked bluester's title of the Board Pessimist! :lol:

 

 

hahaha. Touche. Unfortunately I was right WAAAAY too many times this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be interesting to see what he could at a major football school.

it's officall, navy will never beat ND again. your right it should be interesting to see how johnsons option offense will work in the ACC, should be a lot of fun to wath. with him being former georgia southern head coach he probbly has a lot of ties in the state of georgia.

 

Navy did not beat ND this year because of Paul Johnson. I think he's good, but it wasn't coaching genius that beat us. It was the lack of heart on our Oline, youth, no identity what so ever, coupled with absolutely atrocious work by Charlie Weis that lost that game.

How many points did we put up? 44? Thats on the D. We only had one stop that didnt come from a turnover or missed field goal. If you want to start the Charlie hater shit take it to the SC forums. Yeah I sure wish we were Michigan right now with out a coach and had to scavange for 2 star recruits like in 2004, I sure miss those days..........NOT!

 

Not a Charlie hater in the least bit. I just don't wear blinders either....and Charlie was PATHETIC in the Navy game in my humble IRISH opinion. You blind faith folks are awefully touchy. Yikes...I criticized the coach, I must be a hater. I'm going back to the SC boards.

Remember guys, this guy has revoked bluester's title of the Board Pessimist! :lol:

 

 

hahaha. Touche. Unfortunately I was right WAAAAY too many times this year.

Yeah haha true, true. I agree with most of your stuff too by the way, so yeah haha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest irishrick

coach Johnson , will do a great job at Georgia tech , and He did beat the irish , However i have to agree he had some help from you know who. yous have to admit that. he will be successful at tech . but so will we .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jeebus, i sometimes think some of you guys are here are borderline delusional. do you REALLY think walker woulda made that FG against navy? REALLY? what was his pct. on kicks of that distance this year? would you bet money on him making it? how about your house? anything? yet you keep bringing it up time and time again how CW "gave away" the game with that call. puhleeze! we didn't stop navy ONCE the WHOLE game!! that's why we lost. period.

 

this is the last i'll mention it and i hope to god this is the last thread to ever mention it as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, we got a lot of out of work coaches here at DD, for good reason. The Michigan job is open is anyone is up to it.

 

Charlie sees and knows what his players are capable of, especially kickers. He established after the game that Walker wasn't hitting the long ones during the pregame.

 

I don't think Johnson will take the option to GT either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jeebus, i sometimes think some of you guys are here are borderline delusional. do you REALLY think walker woulda made that FG against navy? REALLY? what was his pct. on kicks of that distance this year? would you bet money on him making it? how about your house? anything? yet you keep bringing it up time and time again how CW "gave away" the game with that call. puhleeze! we didn't stop navy ONCE the WHOLE game!! that's why we lost. period.

 

this is the last i'll mention it and i hope to god this is the last thread to ever mention it as well.

 

Did you REALLY think that we were going to make 4th and 9 behind our Oline? I mean seriously, what is the percentage of sacks that we gave up in that situation?

 

Ok, how about the passed field goal in the first quarter? I hold CW responsible because he didn't go after the points when he had the chance. That's what you do to put your team in the best position to win a football game. Did the D play well? Of course not. But either one of those two field goals and we beat Navy in regulation. BI, the fact is that going for the win....REGARDLESS of your kicker's reliability, is fundamental college football.

 

Scotty...we don't need to be an "out of work college football coach" to see a poor call. I know the two of you want to be behind Charlie 100% and that's great. So do I. But the FACT of the REALITY is that was a dumb decision then, it's a dumb decision now, and it will be a dumb decision if he does it again next year. Maybe Walker makes just one of those kicks and we win the game. We'll never know because CW chose to run HIGHLY risky plays on 4th and long with the nation's worst offense and the maybe the worst Oline in the history of ND. Good call eh?

 

You guys give him a pass all you want, but don't condemn me for calling it as it was...a dumb call.

 

And no...I won't be getting over this anytime soon, even if it means that people on here are so blinded that any sense of accountability to the staff or the players means that I should go back to a SC board or take the Michigan coaching vacancy.

 

You name a single GOOD coach in all of football that doesn't kick those FG's given all the same variables and I'll shut the hell up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jeebus, i sometimes think some of you guys are here are borderline delusional. do you REALLY think walker woulda made that FG against navy? REALLY? what was his pct. on kicks of that distance this year? would you bet money on him making it? how about your house? anything? yet you keep bringing it up time and time again how CW "gave away" the game with that call. puhleeze! we didn't stop navy ONCE the WHOLE game!! that's why we lost. period.

 

this is the last i'll mention it and i hope to god this is the last thread to ever mention it as well.

 

Did you REALLY think that we were going to make 4th and 9 behind our Oline? I mean seriously, what is the percentage of sacks that we gave up in that situation?

 

Ok, how about the passed field goal in the first quarter? I hold CW responsible because he didn't go after the points when he had the chance. That's what you do to put your team in the best position to win a football game. Did the D play well? Of course not. But either one of those two field goals and we beat Navy in regulation. BI, the fact is that going for the win....REGARDLESS of your kicker's reliability, is fundamental college football.

 

Scotty...we don't need to be an "out of work college football coach" to see a poor call. I know the two of you want to be behind Charlie 100% and that's great. So do I. But the FACT of the REALITY is that was a dumb decision then, it's a dumb decision now, and it will be a dumb decision if he does it again next year. Maybe Walker makes just one of those kicks and we win the game. We'll never know because CW chose to run HIGHLY risky plays on 4th and long with the nation's worst offense and the maybe the worst Oline in the history of ND. Good call eh?

 

You guys give him a pass all you want, but don't condemn me for calling it as it was...a dumb call.

 

And no...I won't be getting over this anytime soon, even if it means that people on here are so blinded that any sense of accountability to the staff or the players means that I should go back to a SC board or take the Michigan coaching vacancy.

 

You name a single GOOD coach in all of football that doesn't kick those FG's given all the same variables and I'll shut the hell up.

 

ok, guess what? we DID have a better F****IN' chance of making the 4th and 9 than we did the FG. PERIOD! go look at the stats for making 4th downs vs. making FG over 40! PUHLEZZE! you act like this was a chip shot or something. it was NOT a dumb call. it may have been a somewhat "controversial" call and again, considering the STATS ( also known as facts! ) i don't even think it was that but whatever, i'd concede that point if you'd like. but it sure the hell was not a "dumb call." that's just wrong.

 

i am also not behind CW "a 100%." that another BS characterization. for example, i got into with a fellow poster here about CW calling a play where the TE in motion is coming to trap a NG who's covering the center. the NG, no surprise, got deep in the backfield and blew the play up. i think that's a bad scheme, the other poster disagreed. and i disagreed with CW starting sharpley over JC in mid-season. and guess what? i was WRONG! CW was right! it was absolutely the right thing to do. but i thought it was a "dumb call."

 

i love how the basis of your argument is this and i quote, "Maybe Walker makes just one of those kicks and we win the game..." really? "maybe" he makes one? that your rational for why it was a "dumb call?" a FG attempt that everyone knows had a 2 in 10 chance of going in versus a 4th down play that at least had a 4 in 10 chance of working. those odds make CW's call the right one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...